Amazon cargo jet overran Miami runway and plowed through cleaning van, killing five — NTSB probes whether pilots landed too late to stop

Federal investigators are examining whether the pilots of Amazon Air Flight 7598 touched down too far along the runway to stop safely before the Boeing 767 cargo jet tore through a van full of cleaning workers and burst into flames at Miami International Airport.

The crash killed five people and injured five others, including both pilots, after the aircraft overshot the runway by roughly 1,300 feet on a Sunday afternoon, crossed a public road, and struck multiple vehicles outside airport property. NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy, who held a press conference the following day, described the scene in a single word: "utter devastation."

Flight 7598 was on its third leg of the day. The Boeing 767-300, operated by 21 Air LLC on behalf of Amazon Air, had flown from Cincinnati to Miami, then Miami to San Juan, Puerto Rico, before departing San Juan for the return trip to Miami. It arrived at approximately 2 p.m. local time. According to the New York Post, the aircraft was still airborne at the end of the runway before it touched down, meaning it had already used up the full length of the strip before its wheels ever hit pavement.

From there, the jet traveled an estimated 1,300 feet past the runway's end. It struck a 2012 Ford Econoline van carrying seven contract cleaning workers employed by Professional Ocean Service Corp. It then hit a Toyota Corolla Cross LE on NW 67th Avenue, a road used by warehouse workers and nearby businesses just outside the airport perimeter. The impact sparked a fire fed by leaking jet fuel.

Pilots heard warnings about speed and altitude, and kept coming

Cockpit voice recorder transcripts released by the NTSB paint a grim picture of the final moments. The pilots received multiple electronic "too low terrain" alerts, four in total, and acknowledged among themselves that the aircraft was coming in too fast. One pilot raised speed concerns roughly 100 seconds before impact. The autopilot disconnected shortly after those concerns were voiced, the New York Post reported based on NTSB findings.

The NTSB stated that despite repeated comments about excessive speed, the crew did not respond consistently to the warnings:

"The other pilot made additional comments regarding the aircraft's excessive speed throughout the remainder of the recording. There was not a consistent verbal response to the comments about speed."

Aviation experts cited in the original reporting noted that a typical landing zone falls within the first 3,000 feet of a runway. Runways at Miami International Airport range between 3,000 and 9,000 feet. If the jet was still airborne at the runway's end, the crew had consumed the entire available distance without touching down, a scenario that, under normal circumstances, would call for a go-around.

Investigators have said they will probe the plane's speed and braking data, the weather conditions at the time, and critically, why the pilots did not abort the landing. Those questions now sit at the center of the federal investigation.

Over 60 fire units responded to 'very complex situation'

The scale of the emergency response matched the scale of the wreckage. More than 60 Miami-Dade Fire Rescue units and some 200 personnel rushed to the scene. Fox News reported that the aircraft's engine caught fire and an active fuel leak required a hazardous-materials response.

Miami Fire Rescue Chief Raied Jadallah told reporters the plane "swiped several vehicles and trapped people inside who had to be extricated." He called the scene "a very complex situation," Breitbart reported.

Three of the injured were listed in critical condition. Two others were hospitalized with less serious injuries. Victims were transported to Jackson South and Jackson Memorial Hospital. Homendy did not disclose how many people were inside the Toyota Corolla, nor did she specify where among the wreckage the five fatalities were found.

Aviation incidents involving ground workers and bystanders have drawn increased attention in recent months. A ground worker was killed by a passenger jet during pushback at a Montreal airport just days before the Miami crash, underscoring the dangers faced by airport workers in close proximity to active aircraft.

Homendy described the debris field during her Monday press conference:

"It's pretty extensive. Hard to see and I'm sure it must have been very difficult for the responders as well."

Two of Miami International Airport's four runways remained closed the day after the crash. The FAA confirmed it would send inspectors to investigate. The Washington Examiner reported that a ground stop was ordered at the airport, and online videos showed heavy black smoke rising from the crash site.

Miami airport lacks an arresting system used at 120 other facilities

One detail that emerged quickly in the aftermath: Miami International Airport does not have an Engineered Material Arresting System, or EMAS, a crushable concrete bed installed at the end of runways to slow aircraft that overrun the pavement. More than 120 airports across the country have installed such systems.

Mike O'Donnell, the FAA's former director of airport safety and accident investigations, explained that Miami is not required to have one because it maintains a 1,000-foot safety buffer at the end of its runways. That buffer is an alternative compliance measure under federal rules.

But a 1,000-foot buffer did not stop a 767 traveling at high speed with 1,300 feet of overrun. The jet blew past the buffer zone and kept going, across the airport boundary, across a public road, and into vehicles carrying people who had no reason to expect a cargo plane bearing down on them.

Whether an arresting system would have prevented the crash is an open question. What is not open to question is that the existing safety margin failed to contain the aircraft. The families of five dead workers are living with that result.

The crash is at least the second fatal incident involving an Amazon Air cargo jet in recent years, Breitbart noted. It also comes during a period of heightened attention to aviation safety. Just weeks before the Miami disaster, a Coast Guard jet carrying DHS Secretary Mullin lost an engine before landing safely at Reagan National, a close call that renewed questions about aircraft maintenance and emergency preparedness.

NTSB now scrutinizing Amazon and 21 Air safety policies

The NTSB confirmed it will investigate the safety policies of both Amazon and 21 Air LLC, the carrier that operated Flight 7598. Amazon acknowledged the crash in a public statement.

An Amazon spokesperson said the company was "heartbroken to learn that five people lost their lives," Fox News reported. Amazon spokesperson Kelly Nantel separately confirmed that "an Amazon Air plane operated by 21 Air experienced an incident while attempting to land at Miami International Airport."

The flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder were both recovered from the wreckage and sent to NTSB headquarters for full evaluation. Those black boxes will be central to determining whether the crew made errors in judgment, whether the aircraft had mechanical issues, and whether 21 Air's operational standards met federal requirements.

Fatal aviation incidents around the world have kept the issue in the headlines. A small plane crash into a Beijing skyscraper earlier this year drew global attention, and a father and son were killed when their small plane flew into a storm on the way home from a Cardinals game in July. Each incident renews the same basic question: were the warning signs there, and were they heeded?

In Miami, the cockpit voice recorder suggests the warning signs were loud, repeated, and electronic. The pilots heard them. They kept coming anyway.

Five workers dead on a road they used every day

The people who paid the highest price were not on the airplane. They were contract cleaning workers in a company van, heading to or from a shift. Professional Ocean Service Corp. employed all seven occupants of the Ford Econoline. NW 67th Avenue is a working road, warehouse employees and local businesses use it daily. It sits just outside the airport fence line.

The names of the dead have not been released. Nor have the names of the pilots. Homendy did not say how many of the five fatalities came from the van versus the Toyota Corolla. Those details will emerge as the investigation continues.

What is already clear is that a cargo jet carrying no passengers managed to kill five people on the ground, people who were simply in the wrong place when a plane that should have stopped, or gone around, did neither. The NTSB has the recorders. The transcripts already show the crew knew the approach was wrong. The investigation will determine what else went wrong, and who bears responsibility.

Five families deserve those answers. So does every worker who drives that road tomorrow.

Privacy Policy