Ever thought a former vice president could double as a dating coach?
According to Breitbart, as reported on December 26, 2025, Kamala Harris, once vice president and an unsuccessful presidential contender, offered dating guidance for single women during her appearance on the Rich Little Brokegirls podcast, emphasizing kindness, compatibility, and honesty while promoting her memoir *107 Days* on a book tour, sidestepping queries about future political ambitions.
Harris kicked off her advice with a simple yet grounded principle for relationships. She urged women to prioritize kindness—both to themselves and in a partner. In a culture often obsessed with superficial traits, that’s a refreshing nod to timeless values conservatives often champion.
Delving deeper, Harris highlighted the importance of shared laughter and enjoying a partner’s company in both mundane tasks like grocery runs and more polished occasions. It’s a sensible take—relationships aren’t just about grand gestures but everyday compatibility. Too bad so many today chase fleeting thrills over steady bonds.
“Be kind to yourself and choose to be with someone who is kind,” Harris advised. While the sentiment is noble, conservatives might wonder if this soft approach overlooks the tougher realities of commitment in a world pushing casual hookups. Kindness is vital, but so is grit to weather life’s storms.
Harris then introduced a quirky framework for understanding romantic phases. She described relationships as either high-energy, fun-focused “Friday night” connections or calmer, deeper “Sunday morning” bonds. It’s a clever metaphor, even if it risks oversimplifying the messy reality of human connection.
“Depending on what phase you’re in, maybe you’re going to choose that you want to have that kind of Friday night relationship or you want that Sunday morning relationship,” Harris elaborated. Her playful distinction might resonate with some, but conservatives could argue it glosses over the need for enduring commitment over fleeting phases. Life isn’t always a weekend pick-and-choose menu.
She acknowledged that sometimes these dynamics mesh, and sometimes they clash, likening mismatches to oil and water. That’s a fair point—compatibility isn’t guaranteed. Yet, in a society often swayed by progressive ideals of endless experimentation, a reminder of traditional partnership might have added balance. Harris stressed the importance of honesty in assessing a relationship’s true nature. She cautioned against forcing a connection into something it isn’t, a pragmatic stance. In an era where cultural trends often push unrealistic expectations, that’s a rare bit of clarity worth noting.
Further, Harris encouraged embracing different stages—whether seeking lighthearted fun or yearning for deeper ties. It’s a flexible outlook, recognizing life’s ebb and flow. Still, conservatives might question if this adaptability risks diluting the focus on long-term family foundations we often hold dear.
The podcast chat wasn’t just about romance; it tied into Harris’s broader public efforts. Her book tour for "107 Days" has taken center stage, conveniently dodging speculation about future political runs. For conservatives, this sidestep might seem like avoiding accountability while playing the personal card.
While Harris’s advice carries a certain down-to-earth charm, it’s worth pondering the context. Her focus on personal anecdotes over political questions raises eyebrows among those craving substantive policy discussions. Is this a heartfelt outreach or a strategic pivot?
In a world where dating apps and shifting norms dominate, Harris’s words might find an audience hungry for guidance. Yet, conservatives could argue they lack the moral anchor traditional values provide. Her counsel feels more like a trendy chat than a call to enduring principles.
The “Friday night” versus “Sunday morning” idea, while catchy, might not fully address the deeper challenges of building lasting relationships. In a culture often swayed by progressive narratives of self-fulfillment over sacrifice, a stronger nod to commitment could have hit harder. Still, her intent to help is evident.
Ultimately, Harris’s podcast musings offer a glimpse into her personal side during a book promotion blitz. For conservatives, it’s a mixed bag—some wisdom shines through, but the absence of a rooted framework leaves room for critique. Let’s hope future discussions balance heart with the backbone of lasting values.