Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is set to introduce a resolution next week urging Senate backing for President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan to resolve the Gaza conflict. This bold move aims to put Democrats on record regarding their stance on a historic peace effort.
According to the New York Post, the resolution explicitly endorses Trump’s comprehensive strategy, already approved by Israel and Hamas, and supported by key Arab and Muslim allies in the region. It also urges all involved parties to persist in implementing this detailed roadmap for peace.
On Sept. 29, 2025, President Trump unveiled this ambitious plan alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House. The announcement marked a significant step toward ending longstanding tensions in the Gaza Strip.
By Oct. 8, 2025, Hamas committed to releasing all remaining hostages, a crucial early success. The following day, on Oct. 9, 2025, Israel’s security cabinet officially endorsed the framework, solidifying a bipartisan regional agreement.
The plan outlines an international peacekeeping presence in Gaza and establishes a transitional government free from Hamas influence. Ultimately, it proposes a “Board of Peace,” chaired by President Trump himself, to oversee this new governance structure.
Major Arab nations, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Turkey, and Qatar, have thrown their weight behind the initiative. This widespread regional support underscores the plan’s potential to reshape Middle East dynamics.
An initial cease-fire has been achieved, and Hamas has released 20 living Israeli hostages, signaling progress. These tangible outcomes highlight the plan’s viability in a region long plagued by conflict and instability.
“I think it would be enormously beneficial for the Senate to speak with one voice in favor of President Trump’s 20-Point Peace Plan for the Middle East,” Graham told The Post on Wednesday. His call for unity aims to amplify the plan’s momentum.
Yet, from a conservative perspective, one must wonder why Democrats hesitate to embrace such a breakthrough. Their reluctance risks undermining a rare opportunity for stability, prioritizing partisan grudges over global progress.
“The plan has been approved by Israel and endorsed by all major Arab nations. A strong bipartisan vote from the US Senate will only help its success,” Graham added. His push for solidarity is a direct challenge to Democratic indecision.
Conservatives might note the irony of Democrats withholding support while refusing to even acknowledge Trump by name, as seen with figures like former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Kamala Harris. Such pettiness hardly serves the cause of peace.
Democratic backing for Trump’s initiative remains tepid at best, despite the plan’s early achievements. This hesitation could weaken U.S. influence in ensuring the agreement’s long-term success on the world stage.
Graham’s resolution is a strategic move to expose this partisan divide, compelling Democrats to clarify their position. From a right-of-center view, supporting peace should transcend political lines, especially with such a broad international consensus. The stakes are high as the Senate prepares to weigh in on this transformative proposal. A unified stance could cement America’s role as a leader in Middle East diplomacy under President Trump’s administration.
Ultimately, the question remains whether Democrats will rise above political gamesmanship to back a plan already embraced by key players. History may judge harshly those who let partisan bias obstruct a genuine path to peace.