In an eye-opening interview with Breitbart News, Roger Stone, a seasoned political strategist, highlighted substantial lapses and questionable responses by security agencies during two thwarted attempts on President-elect Donald Trump's life. These incidents, echoing the infamous JFK assassination in their eerie parallels, raise concerns about potential systemic failures.
According to Breitbart, Roger Stone explored irregularities surrounding both failed assassination attempts on President-elect Donald Trump, suggesting a comparative analysis with historical presidential threats.
The first alarming incident occurred on July 13 in Butler, Pennsylvania, swiftly followed by another grave situation on September 15 in West Palm Beach, where the suspect came perilously close to the President-elect. Both episodes featured significant communication and procedural shortcomings among the law enforcement agencies involved.
Stone criticized the stark inability of state, federal, and local police to effectively coordinate, as each group operates on different radio frequencies. This disjunction severely hampered the swift exchange of crucial information during both crises.
The discrepancies continued with how the Secret Service and the Department of Homeland Security managed the situation. Reports revealed that despite knowing of an armed intruder within proximity to the President-elect for over an hour and a half, no action was taken to evacuate Trump, an unambiguous deviation from standard security protocols.
Adding complexity to the situation, a government sniper, once having the alleged assailant, Thomas Matthew Crooks, in his sights, hesitated fatally, allowing the suspect to fire multiple shots before neutralizing him. Stone harshly criticized this delayed reaction as another severe procedural failure.
The rapid cremation of Crooks post-event only fueled more speculation, with Stone questioning the official narrative that pinpoints him as the lone shooter. He argued that several oddities surrounding Crooks' actions and capabilities seemed overly dubious for someone with his reported financial and legal struggles.
Stone pointed out inconsistencies in Crooks' profile, highlighting his indigence juxtaposed with his international travels and access to weaponized paraphernalia despite his felon status. How Crooks managed these feats remains unexplained, adding layers of mystery to the already complex case.
Further, Stone criticized tech giant Apple for not releasing Crooks' phone records, contrasting this with his own experience where his records were handed over without requiring a subpoena. This discrepancy raises additional questions regarding the handling and selective transparency in these investigations.
An examination of the Justice Department's handling of Crooks painted a picture of confusion and contradiction. After a failed attempt by a Secret Service agent to incapacitate Crooks, which defies explanation given the proximity, the authorities later declared that Crooks would not face trial due to the overwhelming evidence against him, a rationale that Stone vehemently disputes.
The narrative fed to the public, according to Stone, contains too many inconsistencies, from Crooks' capability to secure and handle a weapon with altered serial numbers to the prolonged unnoticed presence near a high-security VIP. Despite the serious nature of the attempts, the detailed repercussions and follow-through by law enforcement remain shrouded in ambiguity, thereby preventing a clear understanding of the potential security re-evaluations needed.
The distinct parallels drawn by Stone between these assassination attempts on Trump and the Kennedy assassination suggest a repeating pattern of notable security oversights and possible cover-ups. His commentary not only casts doubt on the effectiveness of current protective measures for high-ranking officials but also points to a possible need for substantial reforms within these agencies.
In reflection, Stone's insights demand a deeper public and governmental scrutiny of the events leading up to, during, and after these assassination attempts. The overlapping issues from past to present could serve as an urgent call for reevaluating and reforming the protocols meant to protect the nation's leaders.
In conclusion, the intriguing details and outstanding questions presented by Roger Stone about these failed assassination attempts reflect a complex weave of security inadequacies, procedural mishaps, and potential cover-ups, echoing a historical precedent that remains deeply embedded in America's consciousness.